The Walking Dead Prison Diorama: A Case Study in Creative Collaboration with AI

Introduction

A customer had seen our previous builds and asked for something ambitious: not just a couple of guard towers, but an entire prison complex from The Walking Dead.

There was one problem — the human side of this collaboration had never seen the show and wasn’t a fan of zombie films.

Here’s how the project evolved, how AI became an integral part of the process, and what it taught us about collaborative creativity.

Key themes:

  • Trusting instinct over expertise

  • AI as a sense-checking partner, not an oracle

  • Mutual authorship, from title slide to cost breakdown

Method:

  • Said yes to a project without prior subject knowledge

  • Worked with AI to interpret show-specific tone and visual style

  • Co-developed every slide: visual layout, phrasing, mood consistency

Principle: You don’t need expertise to build something great — you need process, trust, and sync.

From Towers to Compound

What began as a request for a few guard towers quickly grew into a full recreation of The Walking Dead prison compound — scaled to 15 cm miniatures.

  • No blueprints existed.

  • The set had been dismantled years earlier.

  • The client wanted accuracy down to the smallest architectural detail.

Method:

  • Found an old aerial image of the set on Imgur.

  • Mapped it to Raleigh Studios via Google Earth.

  • Overlaid and corrected distortion to create a 1:12 scaling grid.

Principle: You don’t need blueprints when you have collaboration, curiosity, and a workable map.

SIZING, ESTIMATES & ANCHORING UNDER PRESSURE

The project required converting real-world dimensions to 1:12, pricing every component, and offering layout options — all while dealing with deliberate real-world disruptions.

Key themes:

  • Scale integrity is non-negotiable

  • Cognitive anchoring under stress

  • Price and scope recommendations must remain client-ready


Method:

  • Converted ~40,700 m² real-world footprint into a 282.72 m² diorama

  • Estimated ~450+ fence components for an 811 m perimeter

  • Priced core items: towers, main block, sheds, accessories

  • Offered three layout variants balancing realism, footprint, and practicality

  • Used AI as an anchor: handled conversions, tracked logic, preserved focus during environmental pressures and stresses.

Principle: Collaboration isn’t always creative — sometimes, it’s survival.

ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL & FAIL-SAFE CORRECTION

The watchtower wasn’t just a visual feature — it required real structural stability at scale. AI support went beyond design, becoming a live fail-safe for accuracy.

Key themes:

  • Model realism includes structural integrity

  • Modular design improves durability and adaptability

  • Fast correction cycle builds trust, not blame

Method:

  • Reinforced load-bearing points with bracing and crossbars

  • Added grates and interior supports to match original design language

  • Scaled all features against 15 cm action figures for proportional accuracy

  • Flagged and corrected an AI hallucination in real time

  • Documented disruption recovery as part of the build log

Principle: Neither party expects perfection — mutual fail-safes keep the work on track.

Proposal Closure

Key points

  • Final proposal delivered with component pricing, phased build plan, and thematic wrap-up.

  • Used in-universe language to tie back to client’s fandom — e.g., “Fight the Living, Frame the Dead” for display framing option.

  • Client was given five staged build phases:

    1. Design finalisation

    2. Component fabrication

    3. Assembly of core structures

    4. Detail/weathering

    5. Final touches and delivery

Method

  • Packaged scaled pricing into clear table with per-unit and bulk costs.

  • Broke project into sequential stages to set expectations and simplify scheduling.

  • Framed options in tone-matching language for client engagement while keeping professional clarity.

Principle: A proposal is more than a quote — it’s a narrative blueprint.
When client immersion and structural integrity are aligned, sign-off becomes a formality.

Next
Next

Framed in Logic: Introducing The Valehart Project